Wednesday, March 28, 2012

poor performance of publication

sql2005 standard edition
In replication monitor, under Publication tab, the Current Average
Performance and Current Worst Performance show "Poor" for one publication,
and this has been like this for a few days.
The publisher server is not under heavy load at all. In Perfmon I checked
Delivery Latency and Delivered Trans.sec for the related replication jobs and
all show 0.
Could anybody tell me what else I need to look into and where to start with
troubleshooting? I am new to replication. Thanks a lot.
Claudia
Look on the subscriber to see if there are user triggers on this or
different indexes. Also is the subscriber the same hardware and
configuration as the other subscribers? Are there any other processes
running on this machine?
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1292940D-2268-4C27-ADED-5206FC3CF225@.microsoft.com...
> sql2005 standard edition
> In replication monitor, under Publication tab, the Current Average
> Performance and Current Worst Performance show "Poor" for one publication,
> and this has been like this for a few days.
> The publisher server is not under heavy load at all. In Perfmon I checked
> Delivery Latency and Delivered Trans.sec for the related replication jobs
> and
> all show 0.
> Could anybody tell me what else I need to look into and where to start
> with
> troubleshooting? I am new to replication. Thanks a lot.
> Claudia
>
|||The subscriber hardware is the same. No triggers on subscriber. The tables
involved in replication are all small tables (18 tables, the biggest one has
600 records, and the rest of tables have < 100 records). There're a few
connections to the subscriber DB but they are in sleeping mode. The only
connections with Open Transaction showing 1 are from the replication, which
seems normal.
The articles
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:

> Look on the subscriber to see if there are user triggers on this or
> different indexes. Also is the subscriber the same hardware and
> configuration as the other subscribers? Are there any other processes
> running on this machine?
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1292940D-2268-4C27-ADED-5206FC3CF225@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Have you updated the indexes?
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7D92F872-3FFE-4AF6-B367-D58CD60C85E2@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> The subscriber hardware is the same. No triggers on subscriber. The tables
> involved in replication are all small tables (18 tables, the biggest one
> has
> 600 records, and the rest of tables have < 100 records). There're a few
> connections to the subscriber DB but they are in sleeping mode. The only
> connections with Open Transaction showing 1 are from the replication,
> which
> seems normal.
>
> The articles
> "Hilary Cotter" wrote:

No comments:

Post a Comment