Wednesday, March 28, 2012
poor performance of publication
In replication monitor, under Publication tab, the Current Average
Performance and Current Worst Performance show "Poor" for one publication,
and this has been like this for a few days.
The publisher server is not under heavy load at all. In Perfmon I checked
Delivery Latency and Delivered Trans.sec for the related replication jobs and
all show 0.
Could anybody tell me what else I need to look into and where to start with
troubleshooting? I am new to replication. Thanks a lot.
Claudia
Look on the subscriber to see if there are user triggers on this or
different indexes. Also is the subscriber the same hardware and
configuration as the other subscribers? Are there any other processes
running on this machine?
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1292940D-2268-4C27-ADED-5206FC3CF225@.microsoft.com...
> sql2005 standard edition
> In replication monitor, under Publication tab, the Current Average
> Performance and Current Worst Performance show "Poor" for one publication,
> and this has been like this for a few days.
> The publisher server is not under heavy load at all. In Perfmon I checked
> Delivery Latency and Delivered Trans.sec for the related replication jobs
> and
> all show 0.
> Could anybody tell me what else I need to look into and where to start
> with
> troubleshooting? I am new to replication. Thanks a lot.
> Claudia
>
|||The subscriber hardware is the same. No triggers on subscriber. The tables
involved in replication are all small tables (18 tables, the biggest one has
600 records, and the rest of tables have < 100 records). There're a few
connections to the subscriber DB but they are in sleeping mode. The only
connections with Open Transaction showing 1 are from the replication, which
seems normal.
The articles
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> Look on the subscriber to see if there are user triggers on this or
> different indexes. Also is the subscriber the same hardware and
> configuration as the other subscribers? Are there any other processes
> running on this machine?
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1292940D-2268-4C27-ADED-5206FC3CF225@.microsoft.com...
>
>
|||Have you updated the indexes?
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Claudia" <Claudia@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7D92F872-3FFE-4AF6-B367-D58CD60C85E2@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> The subscriber hardware is the same. No triggers on subscriber. The tables
> involved in replication are all small tables (18 tables, the biggest one
> has
> 600 records, and the rest of tables have < 100 records). There're a few
> connections to the subscriber DB but they are in sleeping mode. The only
> connections with Open Transaction showing 1 are from the replication,
> which
> seems normal.
>
> The articles
> "Hilary Cotter" wrote:
Poor performance import text file
Hi,
I'm very new at SSIS. I've got a package to import a 1,000,000 row tab delimited text file into my SQL2005 database. Using SSIS with a Text File source and OLE DB PROVIDER target it crawls. I do have it skipping error rows but that is the only logic I am using. No indexes on the table either. This is pretty basic and it takes SSIS 1.5 hours, DTS blows this away... Assuming this is not something outside of SSIS(like the network, or a user locking issue), what I am I doing wrong?
BTW -- I'm searching for some batch commit sizes, like in DTS, but I cannot find them.
Any ideas.
From the information that you've given, it's hard to know what the problem is, but here are a few things you can check.
Try to isolate the problem. Change the destination to a rowcount or trash destination from SQLIS.com, see if it improves the throughput.
Is the flatfile on the same machine as the executing package?
Are you minimally logged on the destination?
Is the destination DB on the same machine?
Have you tried the SQL Server Destination?
How many errors are you getting from the flat file?
Rows per batch is on the OLEDB Destination Adapter. Did you try changing that?
K
Friday, March 23, 2012
Point labels on Pie chart
I have a pie chart and have tried every option I could find on the Data tab for the point labels. They bunch up all over the place. What am I missing?
Does Dundas do this better?
Jerry
What do you mean "they bunch up all over the place" ? Have you tried an exploded Pie chart?Edit: Also, on the data tab, click edit on your value. On the point labels tab, you can change the position and font size of the labels.
|||Yes I have tried exploded pie charts.
By bunch up I mean that the labels overlap one another and are completly un-readable. This happens particularily with the sections that are small pieces of the pie.
|||Adam Tappis could let you know if Dundas handles it better. I know he uses it.
By the way, SQL 2008 will come packaged with Dundas technology.
|||Have you made sure that the point labels are outside the Pie graph rather than inside it?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms156263.aspx
Also when I want to maximise space I choose the donut instead of pie
Cheers
Mark